Wednesday, April 16, 2008

More Between Lines

This is to continue conversation, post-reading, on the previous post.

Hillel had been consolidating his rhetorical position all along. The final thesis of the book is that the Chhinlung Israel theory is "107%" tenable but the details are a little more nuanced than meets the eye. The key to the thesis is a proto-Kuki mi lui which fellow Lusei readers will recognize as mi hlui or 'old people'. The mi lui were somehow linked to the Samarian populace ousted/exiled in 722 BCE by Shalamaneser. This was when Samaria was the northern kingdom in the line of Saul, David, Solomon and before the infamy Samaria came to be associated with in Judeo-Christian mindsets. The mi lui moved eastward as far as Mongolia and then turned southwest to finally settle down on the edges of Imphal, Manipur. Later migration of the Hmar from the southwest (Mizoram, Burma) led to the melding of traditions and practices but the semitic legacy had been preserved in the exclusive chants and practices of the thempu priests. The thempu tradition in turn informs the seemingly random claims of Jewish ancestry that one hears around the hills; Kuki-Chin groups have Manmasi as an ancestor figure which resonates with Manasseh, one of the northern kingdom tribes exiled by Shalamaneser.

Pivotal to the thesis is the work of Dr. Khuplam who documents the oral traditions and observed practices in The Wonderful Genealogical Tales of the Kuki-Chin-Mizo based on which, along with some subtle linguistic gymnastics, Hillel connects the Chhinlung Israel mipuite to the lost-tribe group. Dr. Khuplam's effort is commendable and yet Hillel seems to uncritically allow too little to over-determine too much. Negotiating the oral-written binaries of recording data and cognizant of truth regimes implied in such epistemic projections, the subject poses a vibrant potential for more research and with the added bonus of a decent preliminary work done in Across the Sabbath River. If one were to consider findings like those of the Genographic project, rather than Israel we should all be clamoring for visas to Ethiopia or one of the countries inhabited by the San people. That one choses however to stop at Israel poses larger psycho-social questions and how people signify some basic existential issues on larger projects such as 'origins'.

Oh yes, my cousin Zohminga showed up again toward the end, this time as a fill in translator in place of a George Lawma whose antics just didn't fly with Hillel. These Hillel-George Lawma parleys were a subplot worth a serious side-read. To taper off what seems like an overdone blog post, Across the Sabbath River should make for an informed reading if not an engaged one.

6 comments:

Shahnaz Kimi said...

Philo, very interesting...

Not sure if you got my email, but as I did not hear from you, I drove past Riverside at the end of Feb while driving to Las Vegas. I did think of you...but I did not have your phone number...
Just got back from St. Thomas last week, so not sure when I come to the US next as I have exams in June. But now that I know how to get to your town, I will be in touch..

Philo said...

My inbox had clogged so your mail must have been among those i had mass-deleted. A poi hle mai, Rierside atangin kan han hnaih teh lul nen. Anyway here's my phone and dont lose it again 909-786-7598. Call when you're around and let's catch up on what else has happened since the DU days.

Anonymous said...

Heng an sawi chi hrang2 hi maw pawm har ka ti. West Asian countries ah te chuan ni se ka la pawm thiam deuh mahna. They are too biased to include themselves to fit in to the tag of one of the ten lost tribes. Remember my first M.Th thesis proposal! This train of thought is almost everywhere in the world. I think it's beecause of the OT's influence that the Israelites were the 'elected' and 'covenanted' people which we tend to take it as being blessed with privileges.
Pathianin rem a tih chuan summer ah hian an mahni zir chain deuh ka tum (bene Israel)especially their interpretation of the Hebrew Bible.

Anonymous said...

Thil pakhat,heng Israel hnambo nia inhria te hi pawm har ka ith na chhan chu..there is no trace of their jewishness in their lives and customs. Circumcision, Sabbath, food and eating habits distinguish a jew from all others wherever they are, But these tribes are eating pork their favorite meat which is unclean for the Israeltes.
Remeber how the Israelites commandos smuggled the Sudan jews. They found that these people still adhere to the strict religious rites and rituals with the unclean and clean.
C. Rokhuma said of these bar mitzvah as the lost tribe of Mizo not the lost tribe of Israel!!

Philo said...

Mami,
Appreciate your position on the topic and also hope that your focussed research will shed more light on it. I think the topic sets itself up so that it is really difficult to take an un-invested position. In fact, I realised i had my own unstated agenda as i was reading it.

Shahnaz Kimi said...

I phone number chu ka camera bag ah ka zep ta a, ka ti bo tawh miah lovang:-)